"Dead pig" may not be afraid of "water" hot

The Shanghai Huangpu Jiang Songjiang river a large number of dead pigs floating. As at 4:00 p.m. on the 9th, the relevant departments to salvage dead pig 900 bulls and harmless treatment. 9 pm, convened by the Shanghai Municipal Government authorities held a site meeting, to take effective measures to quickly dispose of floating dead pig. Currently, floating dead pig not yet have a big impact on local drinking water security. (Xinhua, March 9)
It is reported that on-site meetings open after the relevant departments immediately according to the spirit of the meeting to act quickly: Shanghai City Appearance and Greening Bureau, the Water Authority take the lead, to continue to pay close attention to salvage dead pigs to prevent water pollution; Shanghai Municipal Agricultural Commission strictly in accordance with the relevant disposal procedures, the guideline to the dead pig harmless treatment; water supply, environmental protection departments to strengthen the Huangpu River water quality monitoring, increased monitoring of drinking water intake density and surface patrols; agricultural sector, According to the the dead pig ear marked sources, coordination of the surrounding areas of the upper reaches of the Huangpu River, The investigation the dead pigs sources, from the source to stop dead pig does not regulate the disposal of behavior.
In today's highly developed network information, the action taken by the relevant departments of the dead pig incident "can not say that is not timely, visible," dead pig "may not be afraid of" water "hot, this is a good thing. When the power is no longer arrogant authorities actively respond. From this point of view, there is no doubt it is worthy of recognition, because of such attitudes, showing at least the fear of the strong public opinion, showing reverence for life (including health dignity).
It is surprising, however, It is reported that just opened in the afternoon of the 9th-site meetings in the afternoon on the results of the Shanghai Water Authority said in a post - the dead pig yet to safe drinking water a major impact. Not a big impact? This is really a wonderful statement. We must ask, how little impact in the end? This is undoubtedly the "99% of the milk is qualified rhetoric, causing a lot of fuzzy space, say it fuzzy, because this statement or intentionally or unintentionally" weaken "incident of harm, ignoring the" 1% " and the so-called "small probability" hurt "little impact", playing concept Taiji think the "skillfully deflected the diagram of the major issues to minor ones, naturally suffering from Internet users questioned.
Well, since "no major impact", then you drying out how the data? The public has a right to know how much this "little".
In addition, I have a suggestion, the dead pigs into the river behavior should be subject to heavy fines and even be held criminally responsible, and did not let the dead pork into the market, but should also focus on harmless so sloppy behavior undoubtedly contempt and challenge for public health and the environment clean. Only a penalty to make him feel bad and even bankruptcy, even at the cost of the use of legal, criminal weapons substantial increase in such behavior illegal cost, and will form a psychological deterrent to other farmers ignore the demands of the public health (or pig enterprise).